明明应该爆光次数应该是30000+的,实际却只有9000+。如下图,今天28号,查看的是昨天27号的数据。
按照以上数据计算得出本应该爆光次数是
50/1.6*1000=31250 即使不达到准确数据,也至少上25000+次才对。
但实际的曝光次数却只有区区9123次?这不是坑钱吗?
而且已经指定了出价为 1.6/千次曝光的。这随便扣费又不给到充足曝光次数?太坑了吧。
广告主投放广告,花费的钱与爆光次数明显不对?严重怀疑随便扣费问题!Advertisers place advertisements, and the money spent and the number of exposures are obviously wrong? Seriously doubt the problem of casual deduction!
广告主投放广告,花费的钱与爆光次数明显不对?严重怀疑随便扣费问题!明明应该爆光次数应该是30000+的,实际却只有9000+。如下图,今天28号,查看的是昨天27号的数据。
按照以上数据计算得出本应该爆光次数是
50/1.6*1000=31250 即使不达到准确数据,也至少上25000+次才对。
但实际的曝光次数却只有区区9123次?这不是坑钱吗?
而且已经指定了出价为 1.6/千次曝光的。这随便扣费又不给到充足曝光次数?太坑了吧。
Obviously, the number of exposure times should be 30000 +, but actually it is only 9000 +. As shown in the figure below, today's 28th is the data of yesterday's 27th. According to the above data, it is calculated that the number of exposure should be 50 / 1.6 * 1000 = 31250. Even if the accurate data is not reached, it should be at least 25000 times. But the actual number of exposures is only 9123? Isn't this money? And a bid of 1.6/1000 exposures has been specified. This arbitrary deduction does not give enough exposure times? It's so stupid.
回答:
cpm和cpc花费是不一样的 你光看展示不看点击?让你们运营参照cpmcpc价格推算一下
其他的也是一样。这后台就默默乱扣费呢
你好,可通过微信公众号“微信广告助手”进行咨询