连续两次被驳回，期间进行了3个月的优化。两次的理由都是：基于传统玩法，玩法上无突出创新点。
并不是说我特别自信我们做的多好，只是这个理由让等了足足两个月结果的我有点心凉。
我们是一个用爱发电的团队，很向往创意，也为之努力了很多，结果等到的就是固定的两句搪塞的话。至少应该有一个让人信服的反馈吧。评审团的评语如何，大众评审的得分如何。这些反馈可以让开发者更清楚自己的定位，也可以帮助开发者更好地提升。
甚至我怀疑，根本大众评审的机会都没有。。如果所有的评价权都在评委手里，那真的能保证公平吗？
按照这个理由来推算，现在已经评为创意的游戏中有多少不是基于传统玩法的呢？
It was rejected twice in a row, during which optimization was carried out for 3 months. The reason for the two times is: Based on the traditional playing method, there is no outstanding innovation in the playing method. It's not that I'm particularly confident about how well we've done. It's just that I've been waiting for two months for the results to be cool. We are a team that uses love to generate electricity. We yearn for creativity and work hard for it. As a result, we wait for two fixed words to prevaricate. There should be at least one convincing feedback. What are the comments of the jury and the score of the public review. These feedback can help developers to better understand their own positioning, and can also help developers to improve. Even I suspect that there is no chance of a public review.. If all the evaluation rights are in the hands of the judges, can fairness be guaranteed? According to this reason, how many of the games that have been rated as creative are not based on traditional methods of playing?
回答：
群主管理都是支付大佬
关于创意游戏审核的问题请查看下此贴：https://developers.weixin.qq.com/community/minigame/doc/000ae8223888a8a2309a4dc0856008